Deezer Plans a New Filter to Help Listeners Avoid AI-Generated Music
Table of Contents
You might want to know
- How will Deezer’s planned filter change what listeners see when searching for music?
- How are other streaming services responding to the growing presence of AI-generated tracks?
Deezer’s planned AI music filter
Deezer is developing a new setting that will let listeners filter AI-generated music out of their experience on the streaming platform. The company announced on Tuesday that it is working on a toggle users can switch on to avoid AI-generated tracks uploaded to Deezer. The feature is expected to be available before the end of the year.
When enabled, the toggle will remove AI-generated tracks, albums, and related artists from search results. Deezer says the option is intended for listeners who would rather focus on music made by human creators. The feature is optional: people who do not turn it on will not be using this particular filter to exclude AI content.
In a statement, Deezer CEO Alexis Lanternier said the company had seen clear demand from users for a way to filter AI-generated music. He described the new setting as an option for listeners to remove this material from their streaming experience and concentrate on human creators and creations if they choose. The announcement therefore frames the feature as a matter of listener choice, rather than a platform-wide removal of AI music.
The rapid increase in AI-generated music on Deezer was one factor behind the planned toggle. The company also pointed to a survey from last year, which found that around 45% of Deezer customers wanted a way to remove AI music from their feeds. That finding suggests a sizable group of listeners would welcome additional controls, although it does not mean every user wants the same listening experience.
Deezer has also been tracking AI-generated music through detection tools. The platform added AI-detection tooling last year and has reported figures on the volume of tracks uploaded since then. At that time, AI-generated songs accounted for 10% of daily uploads. The later figures shared by the company point to a substantial increase in the share of new material identified as AI-generated.
In July, Deezer said that more than 50% of daily uploads to its platform were AI-generated tracks. It reported an average of 90,000 tracks per day. These figures concern daily uploads, rather than the total catalog available on the service. They illustrate why Deezer is considering tools that let listeners shape what appears in their search results.
The proposed filter is a discovery feature: according to Deezer, it will affect the visibility of AI-generated tracks, albums, and related artists in search. The announcement does not say the toggle will delete such music from the platform or prevent it from being uploaded. Instead, it would give users a way to narrow what they encounter while browsing and searching.
Other music services have taken different approaches to AI-generated content. Bandcamp has completely banned AI tracks. Tidal, meanwhile, has cut off monetization for people uploading AI music. Spotify has adopted a narrower approach, making AI tracks and artists more prominently tagged on its platform rather than describing a general filter that excludes them from search.
Apple Music has also been part of the discussion. In August, Variety reported that Apple Music was looking to label AI tracks by the end of the year. This reported labeling plan differs from Deezer’s proposed user-controlled filter: labels can disclose information about a track, while a filter can change whether certain results appear to a listener.
Beyond features introduced by streaming services themselves, listeners are also turning to independent tracking systems to identify AI music. Such tools provide another way to find information about tracks, but their presence also reflects a broader challenge: identifying and communicating how music was created. Platforms may choose to address this through detection, labels, user settings, restrictions, or a combination of approaches.
Deezer’s plan brings several of these issues together. The company has described growing upload volumes, established AI-detection tools, and cited survey results indicating user interest in filtering. Its upcoming toggle is a direct response to listeners who want more control over discovery, while leaving the platform’s broader treatment of AI-generated music distinct from the stricter policies adopted by some competitors.
Key Insights Table
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Planned feature | A toggle to filter AI-generated tracks, albums, and related artists out of search results. |
| Expected timing | The feature is expected before the end of the year. |
| User interest | A survey from last year found around 45% of Deezer customers wanted a way to remove AI music from their feeds. |
| Upload figures | AI-generated tracks represented 10% of daily uploads at the time Deezer added detection tooling last year. In July, the company said more than 50% of daily uploads were AI-generated, averaging 90,000 tracks per day. |
| Industry approaches | Bandcamp has banned AI tracks; Tidal has cut off monetization for people uploading AI music; Spotify tags AI tracks and artists more prominently; and Variety reported in August that Apple Music was looking to label AI tracks by the end of the year. |
Afterwards...
Deezer’s planned toggle will give listeners an additional way to shape their music discovery, while the company’s upload figures show why AI-generated content has become a significant issue for streaming services. The feature’s practical impact will depend on how it is implemented and how users choose to use it.
More broadly, streaming platforms are testing distinct ways to respond: some restrict AI music, some limit its monetization, and others emphasize labeling or user controls. As these policies develop, clear information about how tracks are created and meaningful choices for listeners are likely to remain central to the debate.
Last edited at：2026/10/14
