Highlights

In September 2026, many brokerages held autumn strategy conferences and generally expressed optimism about the domestic capital market despite external uncertainties. Research focus is shifting from a single-tech leadership to a broader, more balanced allocation that favors consumer sectors, property-related chains, new energy, AI, materials, and resilient financial and dividend-yielding stocks. Analysts emphasize China's structural economic transition, rising new-economy productivity, and durable economic resilience, while advising diversified portfolios blending growth-oriented AI and new energy plays with defensive, high-cash-flow assets.

Sentiment Analysis

• 
  Overall sentiment is moderately positive, reflecting cautious optimism among brokerages: they acknowledge external market uncertainty but expect domestic momentum to persist. Analysts highlight the shift from concentrated tech leadership to a more balanced, multi-sector recovery that includes consumer, materials, manufacturing, healthcare, and financials. The tone combines upbeat expectations for new-economy contributions—especially AI and new energy—with pragmatic reminders about cyclical adjustments and sector rotation.
  
  
  

  
  70%
  

  
  
  
  

Article Text

In early September 2026, a wave of autumn strategy conferences held by domestic brokerages outlined a broadly positive outlook for China's equity markets, even as global uncertainty persists. Major firms—including Huafu, Western Securities, Caitong, and Tianfeng—reported an observable shift in research emphasis. Where the first half of the year had been dominated by a concentrated tech rally, firms now describe a rotation toward a more diversified, balanced allocation across multiple sectors. This adjustment reflects both the evolving economic structure and the maturing investment landscape.

Chief economists and lead strategists at these brokerages focused their discussions on the transformation of China's economic fundamentals. They argued that the country is at a crucial stage of structural change: emerging productive forces such as artificial intelligence and new energy are gaining momentum and contributing increasingly to growth. Analysts note that companies that withstand cyclical pressures often emerge stronger; in particular, technology firms that can deliver sustainable advantages after market cycles tend to show greater long-term vitality. This renewed emphasis on structural resilience underpins the broader portfolio rebalancing recommended by research teams.

Sector emphasis at the conferences became more granular, with separate forums dedicated to core themes such as technology, consumer demand, and cyclical industries. Research teams highlighted that AI deployment will hinge on the ability to process enterprise-specific multimodal data and to integrate AI solutions with entrenched business logic. In materials and metals, analysts pointed out that the current market differs from historical cycles: demand drivers are shifting from traditional real-estate and infrastructure spending toward structural demand created by new energy and AI, combined with supply-side constraints that support firmer pricing.

Consumer analysts recommended staging exposure to food and beverage names based on short-term inflation transmission expectations and medium-term structural trends such as supply-side innovation, dominance by large distribution chains, and brand globalization. Across brokerages, strategists presented a consistent view for the fourth quarter of 2026: the market is unlikely to return to a single-theme rally. Instead, they foresee diffusion of performance across multiple sectors and a gradual rebalancing of allocations as investors rotate from crowded trades into validated winners backed by earnings and fundamentals.

From an investment stance, firms advocated a mixed approach that pairs offensive exposure to high-quality AI and innovation-driven names with defensive holdings that provide cash flow stability and high dividend yields. Such a dual approach is seen as a way to capture upside from structural growth while maintaining downside protection in uncertain conditions. Analysts also maintained a positive view on strategic supply-constrained assets—power, certain resource commodities, and agricultural products—where tight supply dynamics are expected to support pricing and returns.

Institutionally, observers noted that the balance of forces in A-share ownership is changing. The market is moving away from dominance by a single type of active fund toward a more pluralistic environment where multiple participants—active managers, passive funds, and other institutional investors—engage in allocation competition. This evolving landscape is likely to reduce the prevalence of one-sided thematic speculation and encourage allocation decisions rooted in fundamentals, performance verification, and assessments of crowding.

Looking ahead, the consensus among chief strategists is that the next three to six months will be characterized by a transition from concentrated thematic rallies toward diversification and rebalanced positioning. Investment selection will increasingly favor companies with demonstrable earnings momentum, differentiated competitive positions, and resilience through cycles. In practice, recommended portfolios combine targeted exposure to domestic innovation in technology, materials, manufacturing, and healthcare with allocations to financials and high-dividend names that act as stabilizers during market adjustments.

In summary, brokerages at the 2026 autumn strategy meetings expressed cautious optimism about A-share prospects. They emphasized the need for a diversified approach where diffusion and balance guide allocation, recognizing new-economy tailwinds while preserving defensive ballast. This balanced framework aims to capture structural growth opportunities without overconcentrating risk in any single theme or sector.

Key Insights Table