Highlights

Steve Hilton, a former senior adviser to UK prime minister David Cameron, tells the BBC his campaign for California governor aims to "save" the state from what he calls bureaucratic overreach and economic decline. Running as a Republican in a heavily Democratic state, he frames his platform around pragmatic, common-sense reforms — tax relief, deregulation, cost reductions and expanded energy production. He emphasizes restoring affordability and opportunity, arguing current policies have driven up living costs and driven businesses away. Hilton says reducing government take and cutting waste will quickly put more money into people's pockets.

Sentiment Analysis

• 
  The overall tone of the article is mixed to slightly negative toward California's current trajectory, reflecting Hilton's critical perspective on state governance (policy failures, high costs, and economic stagnation). The piece is largely neutral in reporting his claims while noting political challenges, including low approval for his high-profile U.S. ally and opposition from Democratic rivals. The reporting presents both his proposals and the criticisms leveled by opponents, resulting in a balanced but cautionary sentiment toward his prospects.
  
  
  

  
  55%
  

  
  
  
  

Article Text

Steve Hilton, who served as a senior adviser in the United Kingdom, has told the BBC that his campaign for governor of California is an effort to reverse what he describes as the state's economic decline and overbearing bureaucracy. Having moved to California in 2012, Hilton frames his candidacy as a return to the state's innovative roots and "rebel spirit," arguing that long-term Democratic control has undercut dynamism and affordability. He positions himself as a political outsider running on practical reforms rather than strict party ideology.

Hilton proposes a platform focused on tax cuts, deregulation and shrinking state government inefficiency. Among his specific pledges are a tax-free threshold on the first $100,000 of income, lower energy prices achieved through increased production, and measures intended to reduce housing costs. He argues these steps would leave more money in residents' pockets by reducing what he calls government "bloat and waste." He repeatedly frames his agenda as common sense rather than ideological, insisting that pragmatic economic reforms can appeal across party lines.

Politically, Hilton’s journey is unconventional. He was associated with the UK Conservative agenda under David Cameron and later emerged as an early supporter of Donald Trump. When asked to place himself on a spectrum between Cameron-era conservatism and Trump-era populism, Hilton rejected that binary, describing his positions as rooted in concerns about stagnant wages and rising inequality. He connects those economic trends to the popularity of populist movements on both left and right, and uses this argument to explain his appeal in California.

The campaign acknowledges substantial obstacles. California is a strongly Democratic state, and Hilton has received an endorsement from former President Trump, whose approval is low among many California voters. Hilton contends the endorsement is beneficial, saying cooperation with the federal government could produce policy wins, especially on energy. He blames environmental restrictions for higher fuel prices and argues expanding domestic energy production would lower costs for consumers.

Immigration is another prominent issue in Hilton’s platform. The son of Hungarian immigrants, he casts himself as a candidate for legal immigrants while opposing California’s sanctuary policies. He says he would not obstruct federal immigration authorities and favors closer coordination with federal agencies to address enforcement concerns, arguing better cooperation would avoid civil liberties missteps such as unnecessary detentions.

Democratic opponent Xavier Becerra, a former cabinet secretary, positions himself as defending California’s values and residents against a shift toward Washington influence. Becerra’s campaign accuses Hilton of being aligned with Trump and warns that his policies would reverse progress on rights and protections widely supported in the state. Critics also caution that Hilton’s rhetoric and policy proposals could lead to higher costs or diminished rights for some communities.

Hilton advanced from a crowded primary field partly due to a split among Democratic candidates. He argues that widespread dissatisfaction about the state's direction — reflected in polls showing many Californians believe the state is headed the wrong way — creates an opening for a change candidate. He points to the large Republican presidential turnout in 2024 and suggests that mobilizing those voters, along with persuading independents frustrated with the status quo, could be a viable path to victory. He also supports electoral changes, including ending automatic mailing of ballots to improve ballot-count speed and backing voter ID measures popular with many Republican voters, while saying he has not seen evidence of widespread fraud.

The coming months will test whether Hilton’s message resonates beyond his party base in a state long dominated by Democrats, and whether a figure who built his career in UK politics can successfully translate that experience to California governance. Observers note the difficulty of overcoming entrenched partisan leanings, even as discontent with economic conditions may provide an opening for his candidacy.

Key Insights Table